Abstract
The American Psychological Association’s (APA) most recent guidelines for the treatment of PTSD in adults recommend cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE) and trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) as first-line psychological treatment approaches. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy is listed as a second-line treatment. This position contrasts with five international and national clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) published in the past decade, making the APA’s guidance an outlier. Reasons for this discrepancy are explored, including that the APA utilized outdated reviews, relied on lower-quality meta-analytic evidence, applied a conservative approach to what constitutes evidence and provided limited transparency into how specific decisions about EMDR were made. The guidelines comment negatively on EMDR in four domains: long term treatment gains, adverse effects, outcomes for comorbid conditions such as depression, and the acceptability of EMDR therapy across cultures. Yet the APA panel’s documented commentary on each of these issues is inconsistent with the published research. The paper concludes with recommendations for enhancing future guideline development.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of EMDR Practice and Research |
| Early online date | 21 Apr 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 21 Apr 2026 |
Keywords
- APA Clinical Practice Guideline 2025
- psychological interventions for PTSD
- effectiveness of EMDR
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critique of the 2025 American Psychological Association Guidelines on Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Underrating EMDR'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver