Abstract
Focusing on the motivations of ethnic Abkhazians travelling ‘to Georgia’, this article
examines the changing dynamics of enemy relations and state belonging in the context of contested, de facto statehood. Drawing on ethnographic data collected among ordinary Abkhaz, I argue that while it can be certain limitations of life in a de facto state that motivate people to cross the conflict divide, it is simultaneously their belonging to the Abkhazian state that equips them with the confidence to encounter the ‘enemy’. This challenges the assumption that de facto statehood is
necessarily detrimental to peacebuilding, instead showing how it can facilitate ‘normal’ relations.
examines the changing dynamics of enemy relations and state belonging in the context of contested, de facto statehood. Drawing on ethnographic data collected among ordinary Abkhaz, I argue that while it can be certain limitations of life in a de facto state that motivate people to cross the conflict divide, it is simultaneously their belonging to the Abkhazian state that equips them with the confidence to encounter the ‘enemy’. This challenges the assumption that de facto statehood is
necessarily detrimental to peacebuilding, instead showing how it can facilitate ‘normal’ relations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 253-270 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Ethnopolitics |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 22 Feb 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 27 May 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |