Abstract
No other infrastructure has attracted more criticism than large reservoir-based hydropower and multi-purpose dams. Their detrimental social and ecological effects make them especially contentious, with opponents and proponents often unable to reach compromise solutions. In December 2000, the World Commission on Dams (WCD) proposed a new framework for decision-making in its report of the same name (WCD 2000), and this has become a landmark for sustainable practices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Evolution of Dam Policies |
| Subtitle of host publication | Evidence from the Big Hydropower States |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783642234033 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783642234026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dams and norms: Current practices and the state of the debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver