TY - JOUR
T1 - De-Criminalising Adolescent to Parent Violence Under s 76 Serious Crime Act 2015 (c.9)
AU - Bettinson, Vanessa
AU - Quinlan, Christina
N1 - Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors received funding from Leicester City Council and the Jenkins Centre to undertake the research study underpinning this publication.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - This article questions the appropriateness of including adolescent to parent violence (APV) within the elements of a criminal offence designed to criminalise domestic violence and abuse. The offence, s 76 Serious Crime Act 2015, prohibits controlling and coercive behaviours towards a person personally connected to the defendant. This spans ongoing intimate relationships and a wide range of family relationships. The authors conducted a small-scale research study that looked at practitioners’ understandings of APV and found that many cases of APV could satisfy the s 76 offence. The article examines the correlation between the concepts of coercive control and APV, noting that there are significant differences that justify treating adolescent-perpetrators of APV differently to adult-perpetrators of intimate partner coercive control in the criminal law. These factors concern the unique vulnerabilities of both the parent-victim and the adolescent-perpetrator in APV, and human rights law requires the equal protection of both parties on the basis of their vulnerability.
AB - This article questions the appropriateness of including adolescent to parent violence (APV) within the elements of a criminal offence designed to criminalise domestic violence and abuse. The offence, s 76 Serious Crime Act 2015, prohibits controlling and coercive behaviours towards a person personally connected to the defendant. This spans ongoing intimate relationships and a wide range of family relationships. The authors conducted a small-scale research study that looked at practitioners’ understandings of APV and found that many cases of APV could satisfy the s 76 offence. The article examines the correlation between the concepts of coercive control and APV, noting that there are significant differences that justify treating adolescent-perpetrators of APV differently to adult-perpetrators of intimate partner coercive control in the criminal law. These factors concern the unique vulnerabilities of both the parent-victim and the adolescent-perpetrator in APV, and human rights law requires the equal protection of both parties on the basis of their vulnerability.
KW - adolescent to parent violence
KW - coercive control
KW - Domestic abuse
KW - domestic violence
KW - s 76 Serious Crime Act 2015
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127618947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0022018319879845
DO - 10.1177/0022018319879845
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127618947
SN - 0022-0183
VL - 84
SP - 3
EP - 18
JO - Journal of Criminal Law
JF - Journal of Criminal Law
IS - 1
ER -