TY - JOUR
T1 - Designing behaviour change
T2 - A behavioural problem/solution (BPS) matrix
AU - Cash, Philip
AU - Khadilkar, Pramod
AU - Jensen, Joanna
AU - Dusterdich, Camilla
AU - Mugge, Ruth
N1 - Funding information: Pramod Khadilkar is a recipient of prestigious EuroTech/Marie-Curie postdoctoral fellowship. His areas of research are, Behavioural Design, and Design for Development. Pramod focuses on both theory and practice to research on complex design problems. Pramod enjoys research by design. He has completed PhD from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. He is a designer by profession with close to seven years of design experience.
PY - 2020/8/31
Y1 - 2020/8/31
N2 - Behavioural design has emerged as a critical new area of research and practice. However, despite the development of extensive lists of possible problem features and suggested solution principles there is little guidance on how these should be connected. Therefore, in this work we systematically examine interactions between major problem features and solution principles, based on an analysis of 218 behavioural design interventions drawn from 139 cases across design domains and foci. This forms the basis for a number of contributions. First, we bring together behavioural and designerly perspectives on problem characterisation via two proposed problem features: change demand and behavioural constraint, related in a two-by-two framework. Second, we synthesised recommendations from across domains and foci to operationalise a list of 23 solution principles relevant to designers. Third, we link these insights in a proposed Behavioural Problem/Solution (BPS) matrix. Further, we identify a number of potential systemic challenges in the reporting and evidencing of behavioural design interventions. Together, these insights substantially extend both theory and practice surrounding problem-solution mapping in behavioural design, and form a foundation for further theory development and synthesis in this area.
AB - Behavioural design has emerged as a critical new area of research and practice. However, despite the development of extensive lists of possible problem features and suggested solution principles there is little guidance on how these should be connected. Therefore, in this work we systematically examine interactions between major problem features and solution principles, based on an analysis of 218 behavioural design interventions drawn from 139 cases across design domains and foci. This forms the basis for a number of contributions. First, we bring together behavioural and designerly perspectives on problem characterisation via two proposed problem features: change demand and behavioural constraint, related in a two-by-two framework. Second, we synthesised recommendations from across domains and foci to operationalise a list of 23 solution principles relevant to designers. Third, we link these insights in a proposed Behavioural Problem/Solution (BPS) matrix. Further, we identify a number of potential systemic challenges in the reporting and evidencing of behavioural design interventions. Together, these insights substantially extend both theory and practice surrounding problem-solution mapping in behavioural design, and form a foundation for further theory development and synthesis in this area.
KW - Behavioural Design
KW - Design for Behaviour Change
KW - Design for Sustainable Behaviour
KW - Persuasive Design
KW - Persuasive Technology
KW - Problem-Framing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093885998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85093885998
SN - 1991-3761
VL - 14
SP - 65
EP - 83
JO - International Journal of Design
JF - International Journal of Design
IS - 2
ER -