Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Different strokes for different folks: Diverse students in diverse institutions - experiences of higher education

Gill Crozier*, Diane Reay, John Clayton, Lori Colliander, Jan Grinstead

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    232 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the context of widening participation policies, polarisation of types of university recruitment and a seemingly related high drop-out rate amongst first generation, working class students, we focus on the provision offered by the universities to their students. We discuss how middle class and working class student experiences compare across four different types of higher education institution (HEI). Exploring differences between the middle class and working class students locates widening participation discourse within a discussion of classed privilege. We conclude that, whilst there is a polarisation of recruitment between types of universities, there exists a spectrum of interrelated and differentiated experiences across and within the HEIs. These are structured by the differential wealth of the universities, their structure and organisation; their ensuing expectations of the students, the subject sub-cultures, and the students’ own socio-cultural locations; namely class, gender, age and ethnicity.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)167-177
    Number of pages11
    JournalResearch Papers in Education
    Volume23
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2008

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Bourdieu
    • Higher education
    • Social class
    • Widening participation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Different strokes for different folks: Diverse students in diverse institutions - experiences of higher education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this