Direction to the Jury: R v Chilvers (Peter) (Case Comment)

Natalie Wortley

Direction to the Jury: R v Chilvers (Peter) (Case Comment)

Natalie Wortley

Northumbria Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Comments on R. v Chilvers (Peter) (CA) categorising the types of case in which a Brown direction, based on R. v Brown (Kevin) (CA), was needed to ensure jury unanimity. Considers its suitability in cases of coercive and controlling behaviour based on particulars which identified a number of incidents.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	48
Number of pages	52
Journal	Criminal Law Review
Volume	2022
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - Jan 2020

Keywords

Juries
Jury unanimity
Coercive and controlling behaviour

Cite this

@article{ebda0b74ddf14fb7a62dac440e745f95,

title = "Direction to the Jury: R v Chilvers (Peter) (Case Comment)",

abstract = "Comments on R. v Chilvers (Peter) (CA) categorising the types of case in which a Brown direction, based on R. v Brown (Kevin) (CA), was needed to ensure jury unanimity. Considers its suitability in cases of coercive and controlling behaviour based on particulars which identified a number of incidents.",

keywords = "Juries, Jury unanimity, Coercive and controlling behaviour",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2020",

month = jan,

language = "English",

volume = "2022",

pages = "48",

journal = "Criminal Law Review",

issn = "0011-135X",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell-Thomson Reuters",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direction to the Jury: R v Chilvers (Peter) (Case Comment)

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - Comments on R. v Chilvers (Peter) (CA) categorising the types of case in which a Brown direction, based on R. v Brown (Kevin) (CA), was needed to ensure jury unanimity. Considers its suitability in cases of coercive and controlling behaviour based on particulars which identified a number of incidents.

AB - Comments on R. v Chilvers (Peter) (CA) categorising the types of case in which a Brown direction, based on R. v Brown (Kevin) (CA), was needed to ensure jury unanimity. Considers its suitability in cases of coercive and controlling behaviour based on particulars which identified a number of incidents.

KW - Juries

KW - Jury unanimity

KW - Coercive and controlling behaviour

M3 - Article

SN - 0011-135X

VL - 2022

SP - 48

JO - Criminal Law Review

JF - Criminal Law Review

IS - 1

ER -