Dis(en)abled: legitimating discriminatory practice in the name of inclusion?

Liz Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores tensions between the policies and practice of inclusion and the lived experiences of disabled young people in education. Drawing on the narratives of two young men who participated in a small pilot study, it utilises theoretical concepts related to disability, structure and agency, and power and control, as it explores the ways in which inclusion can create subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) forms of exclusion. Focusing on the young men's experiences of further and higher education, it is argued that inclusive practices and policies, however well intentioned, can create new and subtle forms of marginalisation through the structures and discourse intended to address exclusion. I conclude by questioning whether, in a diverse and disparate society, in which all our lives are defined by the extent to which we are more or less equal than others, inclusion can ever be anything other than an illusory concept.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-21
JournalBritish Journal of Special Education
Volume43
Issue number1
Early online date23 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • disability
  • in/exclusion
  • marginalised
  • Bourdieu

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dis(en)abled: legitimating discriminatory practice in the name of inclusion?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this