Abstract
Conceptualising the doctor-patient relationship has been a central project for both medicine and medical sociology. This paper seeks to show how an understanding of the distributed nature of medical practice can help us research the decision-making process in doctor-patient encounters. I draw on a range of empirical studies of medical interaction, knowledge, technology and work in primary and secondary care. I describe the 'ethno-methods' (Garfinkel 1967) of patient-orientated medical decision making in order to highlight some of the fundamental facets of distributed decision making. Initially, I outline how decision making is an ongoing event that often evolves over multiple encounters. I then show how decision making is never just a solo, cognitive activity but rather distributed over a range of people. Finally, I outline how decision making is initiated, sustained and transformed over a range of encounters with both people and technologies. I argue that recognising the distributed nature of decision making shifts the focus from overly prescriptive visions of decision making to more plausible, albeit, more mundane sets of ideals. Centrally, a focus on distribution offers new opportunities actively to engage with, support and research decision-making-in-action.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 429-444 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Sociology of Health and Illness |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 11 Jan 2008 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Distributed
- Doctor-patient interaction
- Shared decision making