Abstract
Social assistance programmes involving cash transfers to poor and vulnerable households have become a major focus of development policy in recent years. This article compares the experiences of three such programmes in Latin America: Oportunidades in Mexico, Jefes y Jefas de Hogares in Argentina, and Brazil's social pension. Particular attention is given to each programme's administrative effectiveness, as well as their impacts on poverty, human capital, and household and gender dynamics. More broadly, the article assesses whether these schemes live up to their billing as 'best practice' for developing countries, and how they relate to wider shifts in the political economy of welfare provision. It concludes that experiences have been mixed, that claims about positive outcomes are sometimes exaggerated, and that the potential of these programmes to substantially re-orientate welfare systems and promote equitable public policies remains limited.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 621-639 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Policy |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Doing a Bit more for the Poor? Social Assistance in Latin America'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver