Domestic Homicide Review committees’ recommendations and impacts: A systematic review

Cassandra Jones; Kelly Bracewell; Andrew Clegg; Nicky Stanley; Khatidja Chantler

doi:10.1177/10887679221081788

Domestic Homicide Review committees’ recommendations and impacts: A systematic review

Cassandra Jones^*, Kelly Bracewell, Andrew Clegg, Nicky Stanley, Khatidja Chantler

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews/Domestic Homicide Reviews (DVFRs/DHRs) are multi-agency reviews aimed at reducing domestic homicides. This study systematically reviews research that examines DVFR/DHR recommendations, impact of these recommendations and proposals for improving DVFR/DHR processes. A narrative synthesis was adopted due to the diversity of the 11 studies reviewed. Themes identified from recommendations included: training and awareness; service provision and coordination; and recommendations for children. Regarding DVFR/DHR processes, standardization, diverse teams, and additional resources were highlighted. There was little evidence of whether DVFR/DHR recommendations were implemented. Findings can strengthen DVFR/DHR operationalization and impacts.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-21
Number of pages	21
Journal	Homicide Studies
Early online date	8 Apr 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679221081788
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 8 Apr 2022
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/10887679221081788Licence: CC BY

Advance online versionFinal published version, 209 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{31e1b706232f4121b0fee31714b3cda4,

title = "Domestic Homicide Review committees{\textquoteright} recommendations and impacts: A systematic review",

abstract = "Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews/Domestic Homicide Reviews (DVFRs/DHRs) are multi-agency reviews aimed at reducing domestic homicides. This study systematically reviews research that examines DVFR/DHR recommendations, impact of these recommendations and proposals for improving DVFR/DHR processes. A narrative synthesis was adopted due to the diversity of the 11 studies reviewed. Themes identified from recommendations included: training and awareness; service provision and coordination; and recommendations for children. Regarding DVFR/DHR processes, standardization, diverse teams, and additional resources were highlighted. There was little evidence of whether DVFR/DHR recommendations were implemented. Findings can strengthen DVFR/DHR operationalization and impacts.",

author = "Cassandra Jones and Kelly Bracewell and Andrew Clegg and Nicky Stanley and Khatidja Chantler",

note = "Funding information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Economic and Social Research Council, UK under grant number ES/S005471/1. Andrew Clegg is part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or Department of Health and Social Care.",

year = "2022",

month = apr,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1177/10887679221081788",

language = "English",

pages = "1--21",

journal = "Homicide Studies",

issn = "1088-7679",

publisher = "SAGE",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Domestic Homicide Review committees’ recommendations and impacts

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Jones, Cassandra

AU - Bracewell, Kelly

AU - Clegg, Andrew

AU - Stanley, Nicky

AU - Chantler, Khatidja

N1 - Funding information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Economic and Social Research Council, UK under grant number ES/S005471/1. Andrew Clegg is part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or Department of Health and Social Care.

PY - 2022/4/8

Y1 - 2022/4/8

N2 - Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews/Domestic Homicide Reviews (DVFRs/DHRs) are multi-agency reviews aimed at reducing domestic homicides. This study systematically reviews research that examines DVFR/DHR recommendations, impact of these recommendations and proposals for improving DVFR/DHR processes. A narrative synthesis was adopted due to the diversity of the 11 studies reviewed. Themes identified from recommendations included: training and awareness; service provision and coordination; and recommendations for children. Regarding DVFR/DHR processes, standardization, diverse teams, and additional resources were highlighted. There was little evidence of whether DVFR/DHR recommendations were implemented. Findings can strengthen DVFR/DHR operationalization and impacts.

AB - Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews/Domestic Homicide Reviews (DVFRs/DHRs) are multi-agency reviews aimed at reducing domestic homicides. This study systematically reviews research that examines DVFR/DHR recommendations, impact of these recommendations and proposals for improving DVFR/DHR processes. A narrative synthesis was adopted due to the diversity of the 11 studies reviewed. Themes identified from recommendations included: training and awareness; service provision and coordination; and recommendations for children. Regarding DVFR/DHR processes, standardization, diverse teams, and additional resources were highlighted. There was little evidence of whether DVFR/DHR recommendations were implemented. Findings can strengthen DVFR/DHR operationalization and impacts.

U2 - 10.1177/10887679221081788

DO - 10.1177/10887679221081788

M3 - Review article

SN - 1088-7679

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Homicide Studies

JF - Homicide Studies

ER -

Domestic Homicide Review committees’ recommendations and impacts: A systematic review

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this