Abstract
National anti-doping organisations are presently responsible for educating and advising athletes on anti-doping rules while also investigating and prosecuting them under the strict liability provisions of the World Anti-Doping Code. Dr Ben Koh, Professor Mark James and Associate Professor Daryl Adair suggest an inherent conflict of interest and that these functions need separating in order to offer athletes a fair hearing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 8-11 |
Journal | World Sports Law Report |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 10 |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2013 |
Keywords
- doping
- WADA
- rule of law