Ecodemocracy in practice: exploration of debates on limits and possibilities of addressing environmental challenges within democratic systems

Helen Kopnina*, Reingard Spannring, Shé Mackenzie Hawke, Colin D. Robertson, Alessio Thomasberger, Michelle Maloney, Marco Morini, William S. Lynn, Naziru Zakari Muhammad, Francisco J. Santiago-Ávila, Hana Begovic, Mariusz Baranowski

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the practical implications of ecological democracy or ecodemocracy, inquiring how capable democratic societies are of addressing environmental challenges. It asks: What is needed to secure democratic legitimacy for policy measures to benefit nonhuman species? What would ecodemocracy look like in practice? Different types of existing and possible types of representation are discussed, including the expansion of the precautionary principle, the Council of All Beings or Parliament of Things, and representation through the Parties for Animals. A possible approach in the form of a mandate for proxy eco-representation similar to civil rights through continuous affirmative action is investigated. Limitations and possibilities of each approach for nature representation are weighed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-23
Number of pages15
JournalVisions for Sustainability
Volume2021
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anthropocentrism
  • Democracy
  • Ecocentrism
  • Ecodemocracy
  • Ecological democracy
  • Ecological justice
  • Environmental justice
  • Multispecies justice
  • Rights of nature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ecodemocracy in practice: exploration of debates on limits and possibilities of addressing environmental challenges within democratic systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this