Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction to the new journal, its history, scope and ambitions.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper reviews the current growth in interest in ethnographic research in organizational and management studies, reflected not least in the success of the Liverpool‐Keele Ethnography Symposium.
Findings
Surveying the state of the field, this paper has identified a need for a natural home for organizational ethnographers. The continuing growth and development of the Symposium is also a reflection of the shared experience among would‐be ethnographers who find that, when presenting ethnographic work at other conferences, their choice of methodology is more often subject to contrarian rather than constructive discussion. It is only by debating the merits of the empirical and theoretical themes and perspectives that inform the subject in a constructive way with others, who are genuinely appreciative of the tradition, that it will develop.
Originality/value
The paper presents the case for a platform for the publishing of quality organizational ethnographies and for a forum in which to debate and develop the methodology and methods associated with them. It argues for a “collective manifesto” embracing and encouraging the diversity of approaches and introduces the first contributions.
The purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction to the new journal, its history, scope and ambitions.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper reviews the current growth in interest in ethnographic research in organizational and management studies, reflected not least in the success of the Liverpool‐Keele Ethnography Symposium.
Findings
Surveying the state of the field, this paper has identified a need for a natural home for organizational ethnographers. The continuing growth and development of the Symposium is also a reflection of the shared experience among would‐be ethnographers who find that, when presenting ethnographic work at other conferences, their choice of methodology is more often subject to contrarian rather than constructive discussion. It is only by debating the merits of the empirical and theoretical themes and perspectives that inform the subject in a constructive way with others, who are genuinely appreciative of the tradition, that it will develop.
Originality/value
The paper presents the case for a platform for the publishing of quality organizational ethnographies and for a forum in which to debate and develop the methodology and methods associated with them. It argues for a “collective manifesto” embracing and encouraging the diversity of approaches and introduces the first contributions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-14 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Organizational Ethnography |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 20 Apr 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Apr 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Ethnography
- Organizations
- Journals
- Methodology
- Methods
- Practice