TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of activity pacing in patients with chronic conditions associated with fatigue complaints
T2 - a meta-analysis
AU - Abonie, Ulric S.
AU - Sandercock, Gavin R. H.
AU - Heesterbeek, Marelle
AU - Hettinga, Florentina J.
PY - 2020/2/27
Y1 - 2020/2/27
N2 - A meta-analysis was conducted to (1) determine the effect of activity pacing interventions on fatigue, physical functioning and physical activity among patients with chronic conditions associated with fatigue complaints, and to (2) examine potential moderator effects of trial characteristics (components of intervention and amount of patient-provider contact). Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Relevant content of the studies was extracted and rated on methodological quality. Random-effects modeling was used to pool data across studies. Medium (standardized mean difference =0.50) and marginal (standardized mean difference =0.34) effects were found for fatigue at post-treatment and follow-up respectively. Inconsequential effects were found for physical functioning and activity (standardized mean difference =0.08–0.30) at both assessment points. Subgroup analyses revealed components of intervention and amount of patient-provider contact were not the source of variance. Minimal patient-provider contact had an effect on fatigue comparable in magnitude to more intensive contact. This meta-analysis of activity pacing in patients with fatigue complaints suggests that activity pacing might have sustained beneficial effects on fatigue management, in particular on fatigue reduction. The divergence in effects for all outcomes suggests that alternative ways such as tailoring advice to individual’s behavior toward physical activity may be more successful.
AB - A meta-analysis was conducted to (1) determine the effect of activity pacing interventions on fatigue, physical functioning and physical activity among patients with chronic conditions associated with fatigue complaints, and to (2) examine potential moderator effects of trial characteristics (components of intervention and amount of patient-provider contact). Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Relevant content of the studies was extracted and rated on methodological quality. Random-effects modeling was used to pool data across studies. Medium (standardized mean difference =0.50) and marginal (standardized mean difference =0.34) effects were found for fatigue at post-treatment and follow-up respectively. Inconsequential effects were found for physical functioning and activity (standardized mean difference =0.08–0.30) at both assessment points. Subgroup analyses revealed components of intervention and amount of patient-provider contact were not the source of variance. Minimal patient-provider contact had an effect on fatigue comparable in magnitude to more intensive contact. This meta-analysis of activity pacing in patients with fatigue complaints suggests that activity pacing might have sustained beneficial effects on fatigue management, in particular on fatigue reduction. The divergence in effects for all outcomes suggests that alternative ways such as tailoring advice to individual’s behavior toward physical activity may be more successful.
KW - Activity pacing
KW - fatigue
KW - physical functioning
KW - physical activity
KW - chronic conditions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080840286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2018.1504994
DO - 10.1080/09638288.2018.1504994
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30449204
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 42
SP - 613
EP - 622
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 5
ER -