Eight sessions of transcranial electrical stimulation for postural response in people with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized trial

Victor Spiandor Beretta*, Diego Orcioli-Silva, Vinicius Cavassano Zampier, Gabriel Antonio Gazziero Moraca, Marcelo Pinto Pereira, Lilian Teresa Bucken Gobbi, Rodrigo Vitório

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background
Impairments in postural responses to perturbation are common in people with Parkinson’s disease (PwPD) and lack effective treatment. We recently showed that a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) promotes acute improvement of postural response to perturbation in PwPD. However, the effects of multiple tDCS sessions remain unclear.

Research question
What is the efficacy of eight sessions of anodal tDCS on postural responses to external perturbation in PwPD?

Methods
Twenty-two PwPD participated in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm, and sham-controlled study. Participants were randomly distributed into active (a-tDCS; n=11) or sham stimulation (s-tDCS; n=11). Eight tDCS sessions were applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), with the a-tDCS group receiving 2mA for 20minutes. Postural responses to external perturbations were assessed before, 48hours after, and one month after (follow-up) the completion of tDCS sessions. Primary outcome measures included the onset latency of medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscle and range of center of pressure. Secondary outcomes included electromyography and CoP parameters, and prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity.

Results
ANOVA revealed a trend for Group*Moment interaction for MG onset latency (p=0.058). a-tDCS tended to have shorter MG onset latency at post-test (p=0.040; SRM = -0.63) compared to pre-test. For the secondary outcomes, only a-tDCS decreased the time taken to recover balance after the perturbation at post-test and follow-up compared to pre-test (both p<0.001; SRM=-1.42 and -1.53, respectively). Also, only a-tDCS demonstrated lower PFC activity at post-test compared to pre-test (p=0.017; SRM = -0.82) and follow-up (p=0.001).

Significance
Eight sessions of tDCS over M1 improved postural response to perturbation in PwPD. Some benefits lasted for at least a month. Neuromuscular and behavioral changes observed after the intervention were accompanied by decreased PFC activity (executive-attentional control), suggesting that tDCS applied over M1 can improve movement automaticity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalGait and Posture
Volume114
Early online date21 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Brain stimulation
  • Movement Disorders
  • Neurodegenerative disease
  • Postural balance
  • TDCS

Cite this