Abstract
Electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) systems have been suggested as a possible solution to deficiencies in AKI care and have been widely adopted despite limited evidence. The broader literature, however, describes alert fatigue, end-user disengagement and unintended consequences, particularly when systems are introduced with limited end-user input. A nationwide mandate now standardises the biochemical algorithm for reporting AKI but end-user interfaces remain heterogeneous with variations in IT capability, alert intrusiveness and accompanying content.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 30 May 2015 |
Event | 52nd ERA-EDTA Congress - London Duration: 30 May 2015 → … |
Conference
Conference | 52nd ERA-EDTA Congress |
---|---|
Period | 30/05/15 → … |