Equity, institutional diversity and regional development: a cross-country comparison

Rómulo Pinheiro*, David Charles, Glen A. Jones

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper investigates historical and current developments regarding governmental policies aimed at enhancing spatial equity (access) or decentralisation of higher education provision in three countries—Australia, Canada and Norway. We then shed light on the links or interrelations between policy objectives and initiatives and institutional diversity and regional development more broadly. We found evidence of convergence trends in Norway and Canada resulting in the rise of hybrid organisational forms, as well as the critical importance of policy frameworks in either maintaining or eroding the traditional binary divide. The cross-country data suggest a rather mixed or nuanced picture when it comes to regional development. Finally, the paper identifies a number of key challenges facing the systems, suggests possible ways of tackling them and sheds light on avenues for future research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)307-322
    Number of pages16
    JournalHigher Education
    Volume72
    Issue number3
    Early online date18 Nov 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2016

    Keywords

    • Access to higher education
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • Comparative analysis
    • Higher education governance
    • Hybrid forms
    • Norway
    • Regionalisation of higher education

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Equity, institutional diversity and regional development: a cross-country comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this