ESG ratings in motion: the global market response to upgrades and downgrades

Mikhail Vasenin, Savva Shanaev, Humnath Panta, Binam Ghimire*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We employ a calendar-time portfolio approach to investigate the effects of ESG rating changes on a comprehensive sample of global stocks rated by MSCI between 2017 and 2021 (2,841 stocks, including 2,100 upgrades and 813 downgrades). Rating upgrades (downgrades) result in positive (negative) abnormal returns of approximately 1% per month, both statistically and economically significant, aligning with previous studies. These effects remain robust to holding period definitions, alternative factor models and weighting schemes, and they appear relatively consistent across sectors and regions becoming more synchronised since the COVID-19 pandemic. The market is shown to partially anticipate ESG rating upgrades but not downgrades. The impact of ESG rating changes on stock returns is particularly stronger for large firms, growth firms, and those operating in countries with low power distance. Overall, these findings add to the sustainable finance literature, especially on ESG rating heterogeneity, by revealing key determinants of the ESG–financial performance relationship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Sustainable Finance and Investment
Early online date6 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Jan 2026

Keywords

  • calendar-time portfolio
  • ESG
  • ESG momentum
  • ESG rating
  • sustainable finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ESG ratings in motion: the global market response to upgrades and downgrades'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this