Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Everyday Bordering, Belonging and the Reorientation of British Immigration Legislation

Nira Yuval-Davis, Georgie Wemyss, Kathryn Cassidy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    522 Citations (Scopus)
    282 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The paper argues that everyday bordering has become a major technology of control of both social diversity and discourses on diversity, in a way that threatens the convivial co-existence of pluralist societies, especially in metropolitan cities, as well as reconstructs everyday citizenship. The article begins with an outline of a theoretical and methodological framework, which explores bordering, the politics of belonging and a situated intersectional perspective for the study of the everyday. It then analyses the shift in focus of recent UK immigration legislation from the external, territorial border to the internal border, incorporating technologies of everyday bordering in which ordinary citizens are demanded to become either border-guards and/or suspected illegitimate border crossers. We illustrate our argument in the area of employment examining the impact of the requirements of the immigration legislation from the situated gazes of professional border officers, employers and employees in their bordering encounters.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)228-244
    JournalSociology
    Volume52
    Issue number2
    Early online date22 May 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
      SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

    Keywords

    • citizenship
    • discourses on diversity
    • everyday bordering
    • immigration legislation
    • politics of belonging
    • situated intersectionality

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Everyday Bordering, Belonging and the Reorientation of British Immigration Legislation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this