Evidence-based teaching: a simple view of “science”

Terry Wrigley, Sean McCusker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines the insistent claims by advocates of evidence-based teaching that it is a rigorous scientific approach. The paper questions the view that randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses are the only truly scientific methods in educational research. It suggests these claims are often based on a rhetorical appeal which relies on too simple a notion of “science”. Exploring the tacit assumptions behind “evidence-based teaching”, the paper identifies an empiricist and reductionist philosophy of science, and a failure to recognise the complexity of education and pedagogy. Following a discussion of large-scale syntheses of evidence (Hattie’s Visible Learning; the Education Endowment Foundation’s Teaching and Learning Toolkit), it examines in detail one strand of the latter concerning sports participation, which is used to illustrate flaws in procedures and the failure to take seriously the need for causal explanations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-126
Number of pages17
JournalEducational Research and Evaluation
Volume25
Issue number1-2
Early online date6 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based teaching: a simple view of “science”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this