Evidence review: Peer review bias in the funding process: Main themes and interventions

Stefanie Schneider, Catharine Morgan, Marion Hersh, Clayton Magill, Kate Sang, Robert MacIntosh

Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report

Original language	English
Publisher	Heriot-Watt University
Commissioning body	UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)
Number of pages	39
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.17861/YDDH-B137
Publication status	Published - 2 Apr 2024

Keywords

@book{ee07ed7dbd79424e874aa2f50f5b3076,

title = "Evidence review: Peer review bias in the funding process: Main themes and interventions",

keywords = "Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, Peer review, Bias, Funding",

author = "Stefanie Schneider and Catharine Morgan and Marion Hersh and Clayton Magill and Kate Sang and Robert MacIntosh",

year = "2024",

month = apr,

day = "2",

doi = "10.17861/YDDH-B137",

language = "English",

publisher = "Heriot-Watt University",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Evidence review: Peer review bias in the funding process: Main themes and interventions

AU - Schneider, Stefanie

AU - Morgan, Catharine

AU - Hersh, Marion

AU - Magill, Clayton

AU - Sang, Kate

AU - MacIntosh, Robert

PY - 2024/4/2

Y1 - 2024/4/2

KW - Equity

KW - Diversity

KW - Inclusion

KW - Peer review

KW - Bias

KW - Funding

U2 - 10.17861/YDDH-B137

DO - 10.17861/YDDH-B137

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - Evidence review: Peer review bias in the funding process: Main themes and interventions

PB - Heriot-Watt University

ER -