Explaining collaboration in consensual and conflictual governance networks

Antti Gronow*, Paul Wagner, Tuomas Ylä-Anttila

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)


The conditions under which policy beliefs and influential actors shape collaborative behaviour in governance networks are not well understood. This article applies exponential random graph models to network data from Finland and Sweden to investigate how beliefs, reputational power and the role of public authorities structure collaboration ties in the two countries’ climate change governance networks. Results show that only in Finland's conflictual climate policy domain do actors collaborate with those with similar beliefs and with reputational power, while only in Sweden's consensual climate policy domain do public authorities play central impartial coordinating roles. These results indicate that conflict is present in a governance network when beliefs and reputational power determine collaboration and that it is absent when public authorities occupy central roles. They also suggest that relative success in climate policy action is likely to occur when public authorities take on network manager roles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)730-745
Number of pages16
JournalPublic Administration
Issue number3
Early online date23 Dec 2019
Publication statusPublished - 23 Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining collaboration in consensual and conflictual governance networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this