Exploring the dog–human relationship by combining fMRI, eye-tracking and behavioural measures

Sabrina Karl*, Magdalena Boch, Anna Zamansky, Dirk van der Linden, Isabella C. Wagner, Christoph J. Völter, Claus Lamm, Ludwig Huber

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Behavioural studies revealed that the dog–human relationship resembles the human mother–child bond, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we report the results of a multi-method approach combining fMRI (N = 17), eye-tracking (N = 15), and behavioural preference tests (N = 24) to explore the engagement of an attachment-like system in dogs seeing human faces. We presented morph videos of the caregiver, a familiar person, and a stranger showing either happy or angry facial expressions. Regardless of emotion, viewing the caregiver activated brain regions associated with emotion and attachment processing in humans. In contrast, the stranger elicited activation mainly in brain regions related to visual and motor processing, and the familiar person relatively weak activations overall. While the majority of happy stimuli led to increased activation of the caudate nucleus associated with reward processing, angry stimuli led to activations in limbic regions. Both the eye-tracking and preference test data supported the superior role of the caregiver’s face and were in line with the findings from the fMRI experiment. While preliminary, these findings indicate that cutting across different levels, from brain to behaviour, can provide novel and converging insights into the engagement of the putative attachment system when dogs interact with humans.
Original languageEnglish
Article number22273
Number of pages15
JournalScientific Reports
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Dec 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the dog–human relationship by combining fMRI, eye-tracking and behavioural measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this