External Whistleblowers’ Experiences of Workplace Bullying by Superiors and Colleagues

Heungsik Park, Brita Bjørkelo, John Blenkinsopp

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Citations (Scopus)
    104 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The purpose of this study was to investigate external whistleblowers’ experiences of workplace bullying by superiors and colleagues, and to analyze how the bullying was influenced by factors such as the support they received from government or NGOs, and whether colleagues understood the reasons for the whistleblower’s actions. For bullying by colleagues we also examined to what extent this was influenced by superiors’ behavior towards the whistleblower. We reviewed the relevant literature on workplace bullying and whistleblowers’ experiences of negative or retaliatory actions and developed three hypotheses, which we tested using data gathered from Korean external whistleblowers. Results revealed that external whistleblowers experienced work-related bullying by superiors and social relation-related and person-related bullying by colleagues more frequently, and found it more distressing, than other types of workplace bullying. Superiors’ bullying was a dominant factor affecting bullying by colleagues. Colleagues’ understanding of the reason for the whistleblower’s actions was significant in reducing bullying frequency while support from government and NGOs was not significant in reducing it. Based on these findings, practical implications are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)591-601
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Business Ethics
    Volume161
    Issue number3
    Early online date12 Jun 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Jun 2018

    Keywords

    • Colleagues
    • External whistleblowers
    • Internal and external support
    • Superiors
    • Workplace bullying

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'External Whistleblowers’ Experiences of Workplace Bullying by Superiors and Colleagues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this