Extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil using soxhlet extraction, pressurised and atmospheric microwave-assisted extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and accelerated solvent extraction

Norashikin Saim, John Dean, Md. Pauzi Abdullah, Zuriati Zakaria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

157 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Soxhlet extraction has been compared with pressurised and atmospheric microwave-assisted extraction, accelerated solvent extraction and supercritical fluid extraction for the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from native, contaminated soil. The results indicate that the recovery of PAHs is dependent on the extraction technique. The highest recoveries of individual PAHs were consistently obtained by Soxhlet extraction. For the samples investigated here the preferred technique in terms of recoveries is Soxhlet extraction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-366
JournalJournal of Chromatography A
Volume791
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1997

Keywords

  • extraction methods
  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
  • Soil

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil using soxhlet extraction, pressurised and atmospheric microwave-assisted extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and accelerated solvent extraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this