Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Eye movements and fixation-related potentials in reading: A review

Federica Degno*, Simon P. Liversedge

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present review is addressed to researchers in the field of reading and psycholinguistics who are both familiar with and new to co-registration research of eye movements (EMs) and fixation related-potentials (FRPs) in reading. At the outset, we consider a conundrum relating to timing discrepancies between EM and event related potential (ERP) effects. We then consider the extent to which the co-registration approach might allow us to overcome this and thereby discriminate between formal theoretical and computational accounts of reading. We then describe three phases of co-registration research before evaluating the existing body of such research in reading. The current, ongoing phase of co-registration research is presented in comprehensive tables which provide a detailed summary of the existing findings. The thorough appraisal of the published studies allows us to engage with issues such as the reliability of FRP components as correlates of cognitive processing in reading and the advantages of analysing both data streams (i.e., EMs and FRPs) simultaneously relative to each alone, as well as the current, and limited, understanding of the relationship between EM and FRP measures. Finally, we consider future directions and in particular the potential of analytical methods involving deconvolution and the potential of measurement of brain oscillatory activity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number11
Number of pages37
JournalVision (Switzerland)
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Feb 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Event-related potentials
  • Eye movements
  • Fixation-related potentials
  • Reading

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Eye movements and fixation-related potentials in reading: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this