Abstract
Confessions are one of the most powerful types of evidence in the criminal justice system. Despite the vast amounts of psychological research conducted, false confessions still remain a pervasive problem around the world. Thus, an examination of the existing work conducted to date is needed to identify any gaps in knowledge or areas of further enquiry. A study space analysis was conducted to explore the adequacy and concentration of studies on false confessions. Using a combination of a number of key terms such as ‘false confessions’, ‘interrogation’, and ‘vulnerable adults’, a search of five databases was conducted. Overall, 230 studies were included in the final analysis. A total of 25 independent variables and 15 dependent variables were identified. However, the study space analysis revealed gaps concerning gender, vulnerability, and training and instructions regarding confessions. A lack of work exploring false confessions across crime types and severity was also discovered.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 574-596 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Behavioral Sciences and the Law |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 17 Jul 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Keywords
- false confessions
- interrogation
- study space analysis
- vulnerability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'False Confessions: A Study Space Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver