False Confessions: A Study Space Analysis

Laura Farrugia*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Confessions are one of the most powerful types of evidence in the criminal justice system. Despite the vast amounts of psychological research conducted, false confessions still remain a pervasive problem around the world. Thus, an examination of the existing work conducted to date is needed to identify any gaps in knowledge or areas of further enquiry. A study space analysis was conducted to explore the adequacy and concentration of studies on false confessions. Using a combination of a number of key terms such as ‘false confessions’, ‘interrogation’, and ‘vulnerable adults’, a search of five databases was conducted. Overall, 230 studies were included in the final analysis. A total of 25 independent variables and 15 dependent variables were identified. However, the study space analysis revealed gaps concerning gender, vulnerability, and training and instructions regarding confessions. A lack of work exploring false confessions across crime types and severity was also discovered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574-596
Number of pages23
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume43
Issue number6
Early online date17 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Keywords

  • false confessions
  • interrogation
  • study space analysis
  • vulnerability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'False Confessions: A Study Space Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this