Feet and Footwear: Applying Biological Design and Mismatch Theory to Running Injuries

Wilkinson Michael; Stoneham Richard; Saxby Lee

doi:10.23937/2469-5718/4/2

Feet and Footwear: Applying Biological Design and Mismatch Theory to Running Injuries

Wilkinson Michael, Stoneham Richard, Saxby Lee

Sport Exercise and Rehabilitation Department

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Endurance-Running hypothesis proposes that natural selection has shaped humans into endurance-running specialists. Running-related-injury rates between 20-79% suggests modern humans are prone to injury in this species-specific movement pattern. This opinion piece offers a novel perspective on high-injury prevalence in human endurance running, focussing on evolutionary mismatch between modern athletic footwear and evolved foot structure and function. We propose that non-anatomically shaped, structured, cushioned footwear can lead to maladapted foot structure and loss of biologically-normal function including stability, elasticity, sensory feedback and subsequent movement control. The structure and function of the human foot and its possible impairment by modern footwear has received little attention in running-related literature, but could provide a new area of enquiry and potential solutions for many running-related injuries.

Original language	English
Journal	International Journal of Sports and Exercise Medicine
Volume	4
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5718/4/2
Publication status	Published - 7 May 2018

Keywords

Running
Injury
Biomechanics
Foot structure
Foot function
Footwear

Access to Document

10.23937/2469-5718/4/2Licence: CC BY

ijsem-4-090 - FINAL PUBLISHED VERSIONFinal published version, 679 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{b8ab6deda4ff4f49a5f63414d0a7bedc,

title = "Feet and Footwear: Applying Biological Design and Mismatch Theory to Running Injuries",

abstract = "The Endurance-Running hypothesis proposes that natural selection has shaped humans into endurance-running specialists. Running-related-injury rates between 20-79% suggests modern humans are prone to injury in this species-specific movement pattern. This opinion piece offers a novel perspective on high-injury prevalence in human endurance running, focussing on evolutionary mismatch between modern athletic footwear and evolved foot structure and function. We propose that non-anatomically shaped, structured, cushioned footwear can lead to maladapted foot structure and loss of biologically-normal function including stability, elasticity, sensory feedback and subsequent movement control. The structure and function of the human foot and its possible impairment by modern footwear has received little attention in running-related literature, but could provide a new area of enquiry and potential solutions for many running-related injuries.",

keywords = "Running, Injury, Biomechanics, Foot structure, Foot function, Footwear",

author = "Wilkinson Michael and Stoneham Richard and Saxby Lee",

year = "2018",

month = may,

day = "7",

doi = "10.23937/2469-5718/4/2",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

journal = "International Journal of Sports and Exercise Medicine",

issn = "2469-5718",

publisher = "ClinMed International Library",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feet and Footwear: Applying Biological Design and Mismatch Theory to Running Injuries

AU - Michael, Wilkinson

AU - Richard, Stoneham

AU - Lee, Saxby

PY - 2018/5/7

Y1 - 2018/5/7

N2 - The Endurance-Running hypothesis proposes that natural selection has shaped humans into endurance-running specialists. Running-related-injury rates between 20-79% suggests modern humans are prone to injury in this species-specific movement pattern. This opinion piece offers a novel perspective on high-injury prevalence in human endurance running, focussing on evolutionary mismatch between modern athletic footwear and evolved foot structure and function. We propose that non-anatomically shaped, structured, cushioned footwear can lead to maladapted foot structure and loss of biologically-normal function including stability, elasticity, sensory feedback and subsequent movement control. The structure and function of the human foot and its possible impairment by modern footwear has received little attention in running-related literature, but could provide a new area of enquiry and potential solutions for many running-related injuries.

AB - The Endurance-Running hypothesis proposes that natural selection has shaped humans into endurance-running specialists. Running-related-injury rates between 20-79% suggests modern humans are prone to injury in this species-specific movement pattern. This opinion piece offers a novel perspective on high-injury prevalence in human endurance running, focussing on evolutionary mismatch between modern athletic footwear and evolved foot structure and function. We propose that non-anatomically shaped, structured, cushioned footwear can lead to maladapted foot structure and loss of biologically-normal function including stability, elasticity, sensory feedback and subsequent movement control. The structure and function of the human foot and its possible impairment by modern footwear has received little attention in running-related literature, but could provide a new area of enquiry and potential solutions for many running-related injuries.

KW - Running

KW - Injury

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Foot structure

KW - Foot function

KW - Footwear

U2 - 10.23937/2469-5718/4/2

DO - 10.23937/2469-5718/4/2

M3 - Article

SN - 2469-5718

VL - 4

JO - International Journal of Sports and Exercise Medicine

JF - International Journal of Sports and Exercise Medicine

IS - 2

ER -

Feet and Footwear: Applying Biological Design and Mismatch Theory to Running Injuries

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this