Applying critical systems thinking through phronetic pluralism: Learning from human learning systems and the adaptive learning pathway

Hannah Hesselgreaves*, Catherine Hobbs, Max French, Rob Wilson, Toby Lowe

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    72 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Contemporary governance challenges require both systemic leadership and adaptive learning to navigate effectively. Yet systems theory and systems thinking remain on the relative margins of management praxis, subject to accusations of theoretical remoteness or impracticality. In this paper, we explore how concepts central to Critical Systems Theory (CST) can be impactfully carried into practice. We discuss the genesis and operation of Human Learning Systems (HLS), a recent complexity-informed development in public service reform, and the Adaptive Learning Pathway (ALP) for systemic leadership, as two such exemplars. Through these two illustrative cases, we highlight the significance of pragmatism and pluralism in applying CST in practitioner-orientated and policy contexts and consider the implications for knowledge production and academic relevance. We describe how a spirit of ‘phronetic pluralism’ may act as an appropriate translational device for integrating systems theory in practice and help realise practical improvements in the public policy and management landscape.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)123-141
    Number of pages19
    JournalSystems Research and Behavioral Science
    Volume42
    Issue number1
    Early online date26 Nov 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 26 Feb 2025

    Keywords

    • Mike Jackson
    • Phronesis
    • learning
    • pluralism
    • public service
    • systems thinking

    Cite this