TY - JOUR
T1 - Food insecurity moderates the acute effect of subjective socioeconomic status on food consumption
AU - Godsell, Sarah
AU - Randle, Michael
AU - Bateson, Melissa
AU - Nettle, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Godsell, Randle, Bateson and Nettle.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Experimentally inducing low subjective socioeconomic status (SSES) increases food consumption in standardized eating opportunities. Separately, food insecurity (FI) has also been shown to be associated with increased food consumption when a free eating opportunity is provided. Here, we assigned 123 adult volunteers to a low-SSES manipulation or a control condition, followed by an opportunity to consume snack foods. We measured FI prior to the experiment. Thus, our experiment served to replicate the effects of SSES and of FI on consumption, and also to establish whether these effects combine additively or interactively. The low-SSES manipulation increased food consumption, but only among participants who were food secure at baseline. Among food-insecure participants, the effect was reversed. This interaction was not predicted a priori and is presented as an exploratory finding. We also found evidence that both SSES and FI affected the hedonic evaluation of the snack foods, though the changes in evaluation did not mediate the changes in consumption. Our findings suggest that both FI and low SSES affect the consumption and evaluation of food. Their combined effects on consumption may be complex.
AB - Experimentally inducing low subjective socioeconomic status (SSES) increases food consumption in standardized eating opportunities. Separately, food insecurity (FI) has also been shown to be associated with increased food consumption when a free eating opportunity is provided. Here, we assigned 123 adult volunteers to a low-SSES manipulation or a control condition, followed by an opportunity to consume snack foods. We measured FI prior to the experiment. Thus, our experiment served to replicate the effects of SSES and of FI on consumption, and also to establish whether these effects combine additively or interactively. The low-SSES manipulation increased food consumption, but only among participants who were food secure at baseline. Among food-insecure participants, the effect was reversed. This interaction was not predicted a priori and is presented as an exploratory finding. We also found evidence that both SSES and FI affected the hedonic evaluation of the snack foods, though the changes in evaluation did not mediate the changes in consumption. Our findings suggest that both FI and low SSES affect the consumption and evaluation of food. Their combined effects on consumption may be complex.
KW - Eating
KW - Energy intake
KW - Food insecurity
KW - Obesity
KW - Socioeconomic status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071921993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01886
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01886
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071921993
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 10
JO - frontiers in psychology
JF - frontiers in psychology
IS - AUG
M1 - 1886
ER -