Food system adaptation and maintaining trade could mitigate global famine in abrupt sunlight reduction scenarios

Morgan Rivers*, Michael Hinge, Kevin Rassool, Simon Blouin, Florian U. Jehn, Juan B. García Martínez, Vasco Amaral Grilo, Victor Jaeck, Ross J. Tieman, James Mulhall, Talib E. Butt, David C. Denkenberger

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

After a major nuclear war, volcanic eruption or asteroid or comet impact that causes an abrupt sunlight reduction scenario, agricultural yields would plummet. We analyzed a nuclear winter scenario involving the injection of 150 Tg of soot in the stratosphere using a linear optimization model with and without global food trade. We investigated the effects of loss of global food trade, some simple adaptations like rationing and storage of excess food for the coldest years, and rapid, large-scale deployment of food sources which are less dependent on present day climate (so called resilient foods) including cool tolerant crops, methane single cell protein, lignocellulosic sugar, greenhouse crops, and seaweed. In the worst case of no global food trade and no adaptations, the model predicts a global famine. However, scaling up resilient foods quickly could mitigate this for many countries. Maintaining global food trade would further alleviate pressure on local food systems, unlocking the potential to feed the entire global population. However, insufficient preparation, post-disaster conflict, or economic collapse would worsen outcomes and hinder adaptation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100807
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalGlobal Food Security
Volume43
Early online date23 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Sept 2024

Cite this