Abstract
Stratigraphical time, temporality and change have frequently been studied and theorized through dichotomy, that is two opposed, “either/or” views. Linear versus cyclical and the principles of uniformitarianism versus catastrophism are classic examples. This paper aims to look beyond these simple tensions. It utilizes sequence stratigraphy as a lens to re-view established dichotomies and to explore the potential for a more paradoxical “both/and” interpretation. The main finding is that the two opposed linear versus cyclical views can be reconceived as one synthesized sinusoidal view; other dichotomies are re-viewed which allow for spatiotemporal explanation and prediction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 182-208 |
| Journal | KronoScope |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- sinusoidal
- catastrophism
- time
- uniformitarianism
- cyclical
- linear
- dichotomy
- temporality
- paradox
- change
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From Discrete Dichotomies to Plural Paradoxes: Re-viewing Stratigraphical Time, Temporality and Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver