From 'regionalism' to 'localism': Opportunities and challenges for North East England

Keith Shaw, Fred Robinson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    24 Citations (Scopus)
    57 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The Coalition Government has abolished regional institutions, with ‘localism’ now regarded as the best approach for promoting economic development and shaping and delivering public services. This article provides an early assessment of the shift by drawing upon research in the North East of England, where the dismantling of the regional tier is likely to have a considerable impact given its long history of regional economic interventions and the traditionally strong level of support for the idea of a coherent regional voice. For some in the region, the changes have generated concerns about the end of the ‘North East’ and scepticism about the Government’s motives for promoting localism. Others articulate a more sanguine view: that there is life ‘after the region’ and that, in any case, the long-standing focus on the ‘North East’, as an administrative and economic construct, was itself problematic. Now, there are signs that a ‘commonsense’ regionalism may be emerging – a pragmatism that recognises that, while the North East needs to take advantage of new opportunities under localism, coordination and integration at the regional level will still be required.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)232-250
    JournalLocal Economy
    Volume27
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2012

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
      SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

    Keywords

    • central-local relations
    • governance
    • local economic development
    • partnerships
    • regionalism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'From 'regionalism' to 'localism': Opportunities and challenges for North East England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this