General physical health advice for people with serious mental illness

Graeme Tosh, Andrew Clifton, Mick Bachner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


There is currently much focus on provision of general physical health advice to people with serious mental illness and there has been increasing pressure for services to take responsibility for providing this. For the comparison of physical healthcare advice versus standard care we identified five studies (total n = 884) of limited quality. For measures of quality of life one trial found no difference (n = 54, 1 RCT, MD Lehman scale 0.00 CI -0.67 to 0.67) but another did (n = 407, 1 RCT, MD Quality of Life Medical Outcomes Scale - mental component 3.7 CI 1.7 to 5.6). There was no difference between groups for the outcome of death (n = 407, 1 RCT, RR 1.3 CI 0.3 to 6.0), for the outcome of uptake of ill-health prevention services, one study found percentages significantly greater in the advice group (n = 363, 1 RCT, MD 36.9 CI 33.1 to 40.7). Economic data were equivocal. Attrition was large (> 30%) but similar for both groups (n = 884, 5 RCTs, RR 1.18 CI 0.97 to 1.43). Comparisons of one type of physical healthcare advice with another were grossly underpowered and equivocal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)CD008567
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'General physical health advice for people with serious mental illness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this