Abstract
This case note analyses the Court of Appeal's judgment in R v Kuddus [2019] EWCA Crim 837, on the potential liability of restaurateurs for gross negligence manslaughter after serving a customer with a meal containing an ingredient to which the customer was allergic, with fatal consequences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 516-518 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | The Journal of Criminal Law |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 6 Dec 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Homicide
- Manslaughter
- restaurant management
- Allergy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gross Negligence Manslaughter, Restaurant Owners and the Foreseeability Question'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver