TY - JOUR
T1 - Hand drawing as a tool to facilitate understanding in undergraduate human biology
T2 - a critical review of the literature and future perspectives
AU - Peart, Daniel J.
PY - 2022/1/2
Y1 - 2022/1/2
N2 - Science and drawing have been paired for hundreds of years, and this synergy is still prevalent in research investigating the role of drawing for developing and assessing understanding. However, despite research at the primary and secondary levels of education, there is limited research on whether drawing facilitates learning at the undergraduate level, particularly in human biology. This subject is specifically important to focus on as it can be a core subject on some multidisciplinary programmes that do not require a science background at entry. The literature reviewed in this paper highlights that drawing tasks are well received by students and that they perceive the tasks to be helpful for their understanding. There is also some evidence that it might improve learning. However, this cannot be concluded with confidence due to some limitations with respect to comparison groups, including such a group being absent, using retrospective cohorts as a control, and not controlling for instruction between groups. Furthermore, some of the reported improvements in tests are practically very small. More work is warranted in this area as there is a risk that misconceptions can be passed on to students and between students using this type of teaching activity.
AB - Science and drawing have been paired for hundreds of years, and this synergy is still prevalent in research investigating the role of drawing for developing and assessing understanding. However, despite research at the primary and secondary levels of education, there is limited research on whether drawing facilitates learning at the undergraduate level, particularly in human biology. This subject is specifically important to focus on as it can be a core subject on some multidisciplinary programmes that do not require a science background at entry. The literature reviewed in this paper highlights that drawing tasks are well received by students and that they perceive the tasks to be helpful for their understanding. There is also some evidence that it might improve learning. However, this cannot be concluded with confidence due to some limitations with respect to comparison groups, including such a group being absent, using retrospective cohorts as a control, and not controlling for instruction between groups. Furthermore, some of the reported improvements in tests are practically very small. More work is warranted in this area as there is a risk that misconceptions can be passed on to students and between students using this type of teaching activity.
KW - Teaching
KW - anatomy
KW - art
KW - draw
KW - physiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104261230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03057267.2021.1913321
DO - 10.1080/03057267.2021.1913321
M3 - Article
SN - 0305-7267
VL - 58
SP - 81
EP - 93
JO - Studies in Science Education
JF - Studies in Science Education
IS - 1
ER -