Hard times and rough rides: the legal and ethical impossibilities of researching 'shock' pornographies

Steve Jones, Sharif Mowlabocus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores the various ethical and legal limitations faced by researchers studying extreme or ‘ shock’ pornographies, beginning with generic and disciplinary contexts, and focusing specifically upon the assumption that textual analysis unproblematically justifies certain pornographies, while legal contexts utilize a prohibitive gaze. Are our academic freedoms of speech endangered by legislations that restrict our access to non-mainstream images, forcing them further into taboo locales? If so, is the ideological normalization of sexuality inextricable from our research methodologies? Simultaneously, can we justify researchers being allowed access to materials that are not deemed suitable for general consumption, which may further bolster normalized hierarchies of class-privilege and cultural capital?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613-628
JournalSexualities
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hard times and rough rides: the legal and ethical impossibilities of researching 'shock' pornographies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this