Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Homegrown / Imported policies

Ian R. Cook*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the movement of planning and architectural ideas between places, and it considers how best to understand this long-standing practice. The chapter starts by critically analysing a binary that could help our understanding—the home-grown ideas/imported ideas binary—and it reasons that the binary’s weaknesses outweigh its strengths. Instead, the chapter demonstrates that the sizeable literature on policy mobilities offers far more useful tools for making sense of the circulation of planning and architectural ideas. A case study of the planning of the Stockholm suburb of Vällingby (and the international attention it received during the 1950s and 1960s) is used to demonstrate the superiority of the policy mobilities perspective. However, it is argued that further refinement of the policy mobilities perspective is needed, and this is demonstrated, for instance, by the lack of attention to gender within studies of policy mobilities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRoutledge Handbook of Urban Planning: Planning for the Worlds Between
EditorsLuisa Sotomayor, Nicholas A. Phelps, Sai Balakrishnan
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 15 Jan 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Homegrown / Imported policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this