TY - JOUR
T1 - “How was it for you?” The impacts of student-staff partnerships in developing online teaching and learning
AU - Nichol, D.
AU - Mulholland, K.
AU - Anderson, A.
AU - Taylor, S.
AU - Davies, J.
N1 - Funding Information: This project was funded by the host institution as part of a drive to increase student inclusivity, and centres around staff and students working on an undergraduate Initial Teacher Education (ITE) programme. Following approval from the HEI’s Ethics Committee, a case study approach (Yin ) was adopted to gain deeper insight into the experiences and perspectives of those staff and students engaged in the SSP (Thomas ). Within HE, case study approaches are well-established as a means of supporting the intense observation of, and enquiry into, specific contexts, facilitating rich understanding.
PY - 2023/10/21
Y1 - 2023/10/21
N2 - The seemingly relentless drive across Higher Education (HE) Institutions to integrate both face-to-face and online forms of delivery to create blended approaches to teaching and learning shows little sign of abating. Yet, as blended forms of delivery become increasingly prevalent, existing literature suggests that the perspectives and experiences of students often remain overlooked. This article adopts the position that students are expertly situated to provide insider perspectives that are not always accessible to, or recognised by, those implementing these developments, with regular, intentional attempts to draw upon students’ views and perspectives remaining under-utilised and infrequent. Alongside similar studies internationally, this article reveals the potential of establishing collaborative partnerships between students and staff through a process of pedagogic consultancy to better-inform improvements to curriculum and programme design. Employing a participatory action research methodology, this article explores and analyses the lived experiences of ten undergraduate students and five academic staff members working in student-staff partnership (SSP) within a UK HE context. Findings largely endorse the use of SSP, indicating positive implications for promoting student empowerment, improvements in understanding and engagement, and the overall student experience. However, questions are raised relating to an apparent disconnect between differing epistemologies of staff and some students, the legitimacy and agency of student-researchers, and how SSP can be introduced as part of programme delivery in an authentic way. The authors advocate establishing SSP as part of provision, with the caveat that there must be broader institutional buy-in and robust infrastructure in place for it to be successful.
AB - The seemingly relentless drive across Higher Education (HE) Institutions to integrate both face-to-face and online forms of delivery to create blended approaches to teaching and learning shows little sign of abating. Yet, as blended forms of delivery become increasingly prevalent, existing literature suggests that the perspectives and experiences of students often remain overlooked. This article adopts the position that students are expertly situated to provide insider perspectives that are not always accessible to, or recognised by, those implementing these developments, with regular, intentional attempts to draw upon students’ views and perspectives remaining under-utilised and infrequent. Alongside similar studies internationally, this article reveals the potential of establishing collaborative partnerships between students and staff through a process of pedagogic consultancy to better-inform improvements to curriculum and programme design. Employing a participatory action research methodology, this article explores and analyses the lived experiences of ten undergraduate students and five academic staff members working in student-staff partnership (SSP) within a UK HE context. Findings largely endorse the use of SSP, indicating positive implications for promoting student empowerment, improvements in understanding and engagement, and the overall student experience. However, questions are raised relating to an apparent disconnect between differing epistemologies of staff and some students, the legitimacy and agency of student-researchers, and how SSP can be introduced as part of programme delivery in an authentic way. The authors advocate establishing SSP as part of provision, with the caveat that there must be broader institutional buy-in and robust infrastructure in place for it to be successful.
KW - Staff-student partnerships
KW - pedagogic consultants
KW - teaching and learning in higher education
KW - online learning
KW - curriculum design
KW - student voice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166432493&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0309877X.2023.2241393
DO - 10.1080/0309877X.2023.2241393
M3 - Article
SN - 0309-877X
VL - 47
SP - 1276
EP - 1287
JO - Journal of Further and Higher Education
JF - Journal of Further and Higher Education
IS - 9
ER -