TY - JOUR
T1 - “I think people have been in survival mode”: a qualitative study of community connectivity in a neighbourhood of North East England before and during COVID-19
AU - Cheetham, Mandy
AU - Gorman, Sarah
AU - Pollard, Fiona
AU - Ward, Stephen
AU - Wiseman, Alice
N1 - Funding Information:
AW is Gateshead Director of Public Health and contributed to discussions about the study design and research questions, but did not undertake data collection or writing up. MC was the embedded researcher funded by Gateshead Council, employed at the time as a research associate by Teesside University. SG is Chief Executive of Edberts House. At the time of the study, FP was a community development worker employed by Edberts House, the charity which secured National Lottery funding and hosted the embedded researcher. SW is the East area co-ordinator employed by Gateshead Council. Members of the research advisory group included AW, SG and representatives from Teesside University and Fuse, who contributed to the discussion about the design of the study. MC is Research Fellow at Northumbria University supporting the Implementation Science and Knowledge Mobilisation theme of the NIHR NENC ARC
Funding Information:
The study was commissioned by Gateshead Council in North East England and supported by Gateshead Council Public Health Team. Additional support from Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health (www.fuse.ac.uk), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) for the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) ( https://arc-nenc.nihr.ac.uk/ ) and NIHR Local Clinical Research Network North East and North Cumbria ( https://local.nihr.ac.uk/lcrn/north-east-and-north-cumbria/ ) is acknowledged. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is the nation’s largest funder of health and care research and provides the people, facilities and technology that enables research to thrive.The study was commissioned by Gateshead Council in North East England and supported by Gateshead Council Public Health Team. Additional support from Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health (www.fuse.ac.uk), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) for the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) ( https://arc-nenc.nihr.ac.uk/ ) and NIHR Local Clinical Research Network North East and North Cumbria ( https://local.nihr.ac.uk/lcrn/north-east-and-north-cumbria/ ) is acknowledged. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is the nation’s largest funder of health and care research and provides the people, facilities and technology that enables research to thrive.
Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2022/7/12
Y1 - 2022/7/12
N2 - Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine whether and how community-centred approaches facilitate community connectivity by exploring changes that matter to communities. Design: Qualitative study comprising ethnographic methods, participant observation and interviews.Setting Economically deprived neighbourhood of North East England. Participants: Interviews with community members (n=14) and staff and stakeholders (n=14) involved in a National Lottery Community-funded initiative and 567 hours of participatory observation were undertaken between September 2019 and July 2020. Data were thematically analysed using a community-centred public health framework. Results: Communities experiencing disadvantage approached the pandemic adversely affected by stigma, austerity and reductions in public sector funding. Community members’ priorities centred on the environment, housing, activities for children and young people, crime, community safety and area reputation. Multiagency efforts to promote connectivity, led by voluntary and community sector organisations, were prerequisites in community-centred approaches to public health. Stakeholders reported that these approaches can help alleviate some of the health, social and financial burdens facing communities that are marginalised. Findings suggest community-centred responses were facilitated by trusting relationships, visionary leadership and lived experience of adversity among staff. Issues which appeared to hamper progress included interorganisational power dynamics and attempts to impose solutions. The strength of stakeholders’ connections to the area and to people living there contributed to laying the foundations for local responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Relational, values-informed work with communities provided a platform to mobilise recovery assets. Conclusions: Whole-system approaches, codesigned with communities most affected, can help address the long-term consequences of COVID-19 and its negative effects on health and social inequalities. Further comparative implementation research is needed to examine the partnerships, values and principles that drive success and inclusion.
AB - Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine whether and how community-centred approaches facilitate community connectivity by exploring changes that matter to communities. Design: Qualitative study comprising ethnographic methods, participant observation and interviews.Setting Economically deprived neighbourhood of North East England. Participants: Interviews with community members (n=14) and staff and stakeholders (n=14) involved in a National Lottery Community-funded initiative and 567 hours of participatory observation were undertaken between September 2019 and July 2020. Data were thematically analysed using a community-centred public health framework. Results: Communities experiencing disadvantage approached the pandemic adversely affected by stigma, austerity and reductions in public sector funding. Community members’ priorities centred on the environment, housing, activities for children and young people, crime, community safety and area reputation. Multiagency efforts to promote connectivity, led by voluntary and community sector organisations, were prerequisites in community-centred approaches to public health. Stakeholders reported that these approaches can help alleviate some of the health, social and financial burdens facing communities that are marginalised. Findings suggest community-centred responses were facilitated by trusting relationships, visionary leadership and lived experience of adversity among staff. Issues which appeared to hamper progress included interorganisational power dynamics and attempts to impose solutions. The strength of stakeholders’ connections to the area and to people living there contributed to laying the foundations for local responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Relational, values-informed work with communities provided a platform to mobilise recovery assets. Conclusions: Whole-system approaches, codesigned with communities most affected, can help address the long-term consequences of COVID-19 and its negative effects on health and social inequalities. Further comparative implementation research is needed to examine the partnerships, values and principles that drive success and inclusion.
KW - Public health
KW - qualitative research
KW - COVID-19
KW - Residence Characteristics
KW - COVID-19/epidemiology
KW - Pandemics
KW - Humans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133929057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052623
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052623
M3 - Article
C2 - 35820763
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
SP - e052623
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 7
M1 - e052623
ER -