Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Illiberal peace-building in Asia: a comparative overview

Claire Q. Smith*, Lars Waldorf, Rajesh Venugopal, Gerard McCarthy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, there have been significant and historic breakthroughs in resolving protracted ethnic conflicts in restive regions of several states in South and South-East Asia. After decades of violence, Indonesia, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Thailand have all witnessed periods of reduced conflict and increased stability. Peace-building as practiced in these states departs markedly from the liberal and post-liberal models in which Western actors and liberal norms play a key role. Here, by contrast, peace-building is driven by domestic actors applying illiberal norms and practices. In this introductory article, we trace the shift from liberal to post-liberal to illiberal peace-building, define illiberal peace-building, discuss the case studies presented in this special issue, and finally draw out common themes and policy implications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalConflict, Security and Development
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Asia
  • ethnic conflict
  • illiberal peace-building
  • political settlements
  • sub-national

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Illiberal peace-building in Asia: a comparative overview'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this