TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of measured and simulated tundra snowpack properties on heat transfer
AU - Dutch, Victoria R.
AU - Rutter, Nick
AU - Wake, Leanne
AU - Sandells, Melody
AU - Derksen, Chris
AU - Walker, Branden
AU - Gosselin, Gabriel Hould
AU - Sonnentag, Oliver
AU - Essery, Richard
AU - Kelly, Richard
AU - Marsh, Philip
AU - King, Joshua
AU - Boike, Julia
N1 - Funding information: VRD was funded by an RDF Studentship from Northumbria University and the Northern Water Futures project. NR and LW were supported by NERC Grant NE/W003686/1. NR and RE were supported by NERC Arctic Office United Kingdom & Canada Arctic Partnership Travel Bursaries. Funding for JB was provided from the Helmholtz Association in the framework of MOSES (Modular Observation Solutions for Earth Systems). This project was conducted with approval issued by Aurora Research Institute – Aurora College (License Nos. 16237 & 16501). The authors would like to acknowledge that this study occurred within the Inuvialuit Settlement Region located in the Western Canadian Arctic.
PY - 2022/10/11
Y1 - 2022/10/11
N2 - Snowpack microstructure controls the transfer of heat to, and the temperature of, the underlying soils. In situ measurements of snow and soil properties from four field campaigns during two winters (March and November 2018, January and March 2019) were compared to an ensemble of CLM5.0 (Community Land Model) simulations, at Trail Valley Creek, Northwest 20 Territories, Canada. Snow MicroPenetrometer profiles allowed snowpack density and thermal conductivity to be derived at higher vertical resolution (1.25 mm) and a larger sample size (n = 1050) compared to traditional snowpit observations (3 cm vertical resolution; n = 115). Comparing measurements with simulations shows CLM overestimated snow thermal conductivity by a factor of 3, leading to a cold bias in wintertime soil temperatures (RMSE = 5.8 ℃). Two different approaches were taken to reduce this bias: alternative parameterisations of snow thermal conductivity and the application of a correction factor. All 25 the evaluated parameterisations of snow thermal conductivity improved simulations of wintertime soil temperatures, with that of Sturm et al. (1997) having the greatest impact (RMSE = 2.5 ℃). The required correction factor is strongly related to snow depth (R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 0.066) and thus differs between the two snow seasons, limiting the applicability of such an approach. Improving simulated snow properties and the corresponding heat flux is important, as wintertime soil temperatures are an important control on subnivean soil respiration, and hence impact Arctic winter carbon fluxes and budgets.
AB - Snowpack microstructure controls the transfer of heat to, and the temperature of, the underlying soils. In situ measurements of snow and soil properties from four field campaigns during two winters (March and November 2018, January and March 2019) were compared to an ensemble of CLM5.0 (Community Land Model) simulations, at Trail Valley Creek, Northwest 20 Territories, Canada. Snow MicroPenetrometer profiles allowed snowpack density and thermal conductivity to be derived at higher vertical resolution (1.25 mm) and a larger sample size (n = 1050) compared to traditional snowpit observations (3 cm vertical resolution; n = 115). Comparing measurements with simulations shows CLM overestimated snow thermal conductivity by a factor of 3, leading to a cold bias in wintertime soil temperatures (RMSE = 5.8 ℃). Two different approaches were taken to reduce this bias: alternative parameterisations of snow thermal conductivity and the application of a correction factor. All 25 the evaluated parameterisations of snow thermal conductivity improved simulations of wintertime soil temperatures, with that of Sturm et al. (1997) having the greatest impact (RMSE = 2.5 ℃). The required correction factor is strongly related to snow depth (R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 0.066) and thus differs between the two snow seasons, limiting the applicability of such an approach. Improving simulated snow properties and the corresponding heat flux is important, as wintertime soil temperatures are an important control on subnivean soil respiration, and hence impact Arctic winter carbon fluxes and budgets.
U2 - 10.5194/tc-16-4201-2022
DO - 10.5194/tc-16-4201-2022
M3 - Article
SN - 1994-0424
VL - 16
SP - 4201
EP - 4222
JO - The Cryosphere
JF - The Cryosphere
IS - 10
ER -