Impact of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Britain: Implications for rural studies

Alister Scott*, Michael Christie, Peter Midmore

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper assesses the impact of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in terms of its implications for the discipline of rural studies. In particular, it focuses on the position of agriculture in rural economy and society, the standing of the government after its management of the outbreak, and the performance of the new devolved regional tiers of government. After a brief review of the history and aggregate impact of the outbreak, the general themes of the paper are explored from a range of Welsh case-study evidence, showing the impact on farm structures and the environment, rural communities and their social life. The major conclusions are that the unanticipated magnitude of effect of the outbreak should direct more attention to the nature of the space shared as a public good by agriculture and rural tourism; that the loss of trust in administrations as a result of the specific management of the outbreak reveals scope for new approaches in the study of governance and partnership at a rural level; and the opportunity for the devolved administrations to emphasise a difference in perspective, on both the outbreak and rural issues in general, highlights potentially widening fault-lines in the constitutional reform process, especially as discussion over the future of European rural policies proceed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Britain: Implications for rural studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this