TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings
T2 - Managing tensions in rehabilitation care
AU - ReSpAct-group
AU - Hoekstra, Femke
AU - van Offenbeek, Marjolein A.G.
AU - Dekker, Rienk
AU - Hettinga, Florentina J.
AU - Hoekstra, Trynke
AU - van der Woude, Lucas H.V.
AU - van der Schans, Cees P.
AU - Heijen, Elien
AU - van der Dussen, Luikje
AU - van Vilsteren, Anniek
AU - van der Sijde, Jurrian
AU - Bosselaar, Henk
AU - van Haeften, Femke
AU - van Cuijck, Anke
AU - Gardeniers, Sharlon
AU - Lassche, Harriet
AU - Bink, Astrid
AU - van Abswoude, Japhet
AU - van Driel, Ronald
AU - van Aanholt, Peter
AU - Ott-Jansen, Joyce
AU - Schoemaker, Jacobine
AU - van Noord, Arno
AU - Huizer, Leo
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (grant no. 319758) and Stichting Beatrixoord Noord-Nederland. The study was supported by Stichting Onbeperkt Sportief (since 2016 part of the Knowledge Centre for Sport Netherlands and Stichting Special Heroes Nederland).
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Background: Although the importance of evaluating implementation fidelity is acknowledged, little is known about heterogeneity in fidelity over time. This study aims to generate insight into the heterogeneity in implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings and the relationship with changes in patients' health behavior. Methods: This study used longitudinal data from the nationwide implementation of an evidence-informed physical activity promotion program in Dutch rehabilitation care. Fidelity scores were calculated based on annual surveys filled in by involved professionals (n = ± 70). Higher fidelity scores indicate a more complete implementation of the program's core components. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on the implementation fidelity scores of 17 organizations at three different time points. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to explore organizational and professional differences between identified trajectories. Regression analyses were conducted to determine differences in patient outcomes. Results: Three trajectories were identified as the following: 'stable high fidelity' (n = 9), 'moderate and improving fidelity' (n = 6), and 'unstable fidelity' (n = 2). The stable high fidelity organizations were generally smaller, started earlier, and implemented the program in a more structured way compared to moderate and improving fidelity organizations. At the implementation period's start and end, support from physicians and physiotherapists, professionals' appreciation, and program compatibility were rated more positively by professionals working in stable high fidelity organizations as compared to the moderate and improving fidelity organizations (p < .05). Qualitative data showed that the stable high fidelity organizations had often an explicit vision and strategy about the implementation of the program. Intriguingly, the trajectories were not associated with patients' self-reported physical activity outcomes (adjusted model β = - 651.6, t(613) = - 1032, p = .303). Conclusions: Differences in organizational-level implementation fidelity trajectories did not result in outcome differences at patient-level. This suggests that an effective implementation fidelity trajectory is contingent on the local organization's conditions. More specifically, achieving stable high implementation fidelity required the management of tensions: realizing a localized change vision, while safeguarding the program's standardized core components and engaging the scarce physicians throughout the process. When scaling up evidence-informed health promotion programs, we propose to tailor the management of implementation tensions to local organizations' starting position, size, and circumstances. Trial registration: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3961. Registered 18 April 2013.
AB - Background: Although the importance of evaluating implementation fidelity is acknowledged, little is known about heterogeneity in fidelity over time. This study aims to generate insight into the heterogeneity in implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings and the relationship with changes in patients' health behavior. Methods: This study used longitudinal data from the nationwide implementation of an evidence-informed physical activity promotion program in Dutch rehabilitation care. Fidelity scores were calculated based on annual surveys filled in by involved professionals (n = ± 70). Higher fidelity scores indicate a more complete implementation of the program's core components. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on the implementation fidelity scores of 17 organizations at three different time points. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to explore organizational and professional differences between identified trajectories. Regression analyses were conducted to determine differences in patient outcomes. Results: Three trajectories were identified as the following: 'stable high fidelity' (n = 9), 'moderate and improving fidelity' (n = 6), and 'unstable fidelity' (n = 2). The stable high fidelity organizations were generally smaller, started earlier, and implemented the program in a more structured way compared to moderate and improving fidelity organizations. At the implementation period's start and end, support from physicians and physiotherapists, professionals' appreciation, and program compatibility were rated more positively by professionals working in stable high fidelity organizations as compared to the moderate and improving fidelity organizations (p < .05). Qualitative data showed that the stable high fidelity organizations had often an explicit vision and strategy about the implementation of the program. Intriguingly, the trajectories were not associated with patients' self-reported physical activity outcomes (adjusted model β = - 651.6, t(613) = - 1032, p = .303). Conclusions: Differences in organizational-level implementation fidelity trajectories did not result in outcome differences at patient-level. This suggests that an effective implementation fidelity trajectory is contingent on the local organization's conditions. More specifically, achieving stable high implementation fidelity required the management of tensions: realizing a localized change vision, while safeguarding the program's standardized core components and engaging the scarce physicians throughout the process. When scaling up evidence-informed health promotion programs, we propose to tailor the management of implementation tensions to local organizations' starting position, size, and circumstances. Trial registration: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3961. Registered 18 April 2013.
KW - Active lifestyle
KW - Dissemination
KW - Knowledge-translation
KW - Mixed-methods
KW - Multidisciplinary care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036615499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13012-017-0667-8
DO - 10.1186/s13012-017-0667-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 29191230
AN - SCOPUS:85036615499
SN - 1748-5908
VL - 12
JO - Implementation Science
JF - Implementation Science
IS - 1
M1 - 143
ER -