TY - JOUR
T1 - Independent effects of collocation strength and contextual predictability on eye movements in reading
AU - Li, Hui
AU - Warrington, Kayleigh L.
AU - Pagán, Ascensión
AU - Paterson, Kevin B.
AU - Wang, Xialou
N1 - Funding information: The research was funded by a Major Project of National Social Science Foundation grant (14ZDB155) and a Humanities and Social Science Foundation grant from the Education Ministry of the People’s Republic of China (No. 19YJC740027). Hui Li is first author, and Xiaolu Wang and Kevin Paterson are joint corresponding authors. All authors contributed to the experimental design. Hui Li, Kayleigh Warrington, Ascension Pagan and Kevin Paterson designed the materials, Hui Li collected the data, Hui Li, Kayleigh Warrington and Ascension Pagan analysed the data, Hui Li and Kevin Paterson wrote the manuscript. Kayleigh Warrington, Ascension Pagan and Xiaolu Wang gave critical comments. Stimuli, data files and R scripts used for analyses are available via the University of Leicester Figshare site: https://figshare.com/s/6a977198684e9a10fe76
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - Collocations are commonly co-occurring word pairs, such as “black coffee”. Previous research has demonstrated a processing advantage for collocations compared to novel phrases, suggesting that readers are sensitive to the frequency that words co-occur in phrases. However, a further question concerns whether this processing advantage for collocations occurs independently from effects of contextual predictability. We examined this issue in an eye movement experiment using adjective–noun pairs that are strong collocations (e.g. “black coffee”) or weak collocations (e.g. “bitter coffee”), based on co-occurrence statistics. These were presented in sentences where the shared concept they expressed (e.g. coffee) was predictable or unpredictable from the prior sentence context. We observed clear effects of collocation strength, with shorter reading times for strong compared to weak collocations. Moreover, these effects occurred independently of effects of contextual predictability. The findings therefore provide novel evidence that a processing advantage for collocations is not driven by contextual expectations.
AB - Collocations are commonly co-occurring word pairs, such as “black coffee”. Previous research has demonstrated a processing advantage for collocations compared to novel phrases, suggesting that readers are sensitive to the frequency that words co-occur in phrases. However, a further question concerns whether this processing advantage for collocations occurs independently from effects of contextual predictability. We examined this issue in an eye movement experiment using adjective–noun pairs that are strong collocations (e.g. “black coffee”) or weak collocations (e.g. “bitter coffee”), based on co-occurrence statistics. These were presented in sentences where the shared concept they expressed (e.g. coffee) was predictable or unpredictable from the prior sentence context. We observed clear effects of collocation strength, with shorter reading times for strong compared to weak collocations. Moreover, these effects occurred independently of effects of contextual predictability. The findings therefore provide novel evidence that a processing advantage for collocations is not driven by contextual expectations.
KW - phrasal frequency
KW - contextual predictability
KW - collocations
KW - Eye movements in reading
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105996710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2021.1922726
DO - 10.1080/23273798.2021.1922726
M3 - Article
SN - 2327-3798
VL - 36
SP - 1001
EP - 1009
JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
IS - 8
ER -