Indirect contact and prejudice reduction: Limits and possibilities

Rupert Brown*, Jenny Paterson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Here we review recent developments in the field of indirect intergroup contact, an extension of the classic Contact Hypothesis. Three forms of indirect contact are assessed: extended, vicarious and imagined. The strengths and limitations of each are evaluated. Although not as potent as direct contact, indirect forms of contact generally offer a more diverse set of practical solutions for reducing prejudice, especially in challenging contexts where direct contact may be infrequent or impossible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-24
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume11
Early online date2 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indirect contact and prejudice reduction: Limits and possibilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this