Abstract
Here we review recent developments in the field of indirect intergroup contact, an extension of the classic Contact Hypothesis. Three forms of indirect contact are assessed: extended, vicarious and imagined. The strengths and limitations of each are evaluated. Although not as potent as direct contact, indirect forms of contact generally offer a more diverse set of practical solutions for reducing prejudice, especially in challenging contexts where direct contact may be infrequent or impossible.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 20-24 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Current Opinion in Psychology |
| Volume | 11 |
| Early online date | 2 May 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |