TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
AU - Hughes, Luke
AU - Jeffries, Owen
AU - Waldron, Mark
AU - Rosenblatt, Ben
AU - Gissane, Conor
AU - Paton, Bruce
AU - Patterson, Stephen D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Hughes et al.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: Total arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) is used to prescribe pressures for surgery, blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). AOP is often measured in a supine position; however, the influence of body position on AOP measurement is unknown and may influence level of occlusion in different positions during BFR and IPC. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of body position on AOP. Methods: Fifty healthy individuals (age = 29 ± 6 y) underwent AOP measurements on the dominant lower-limb in supine, seated and standing positions in a randomised order. AOP was measured automatically using the DelfiPersonalised Tourniquet System device, with each measurement separated by 5 min of rest. Results: Arterial occlusive pressure was significantly lower in the supine position compared to the seated position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and standing position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 241.50 ± 49.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). AOP was significantly higher in the standing position compared to the seated position (241.50 ± 49.3 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). Discussion: Arterial occlusive pressure measurement is body position dependent, thus for accurate prescription of occlusion pressure during surgery, BFR and IPC, AOP should be measured in the position intended for subsequent application of occlusion.
AB - Background: Total arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) is used to prescribe pressures for surgery, blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). AOP is often measured in a supine position; however, the influence of body position on AOP measurement is unknown and may influence level of occlusion in different positions during BFR and IPC. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of body position on AOP. Methods: Fifty healthy individuals (age = 29 ± 6 y) underwent AOP measurements on the dominant lower-limb in supine, seated and standing positions in a randomised order. AOP was measured automatically using the DelfiPersonalised Tourniquet System device, with each measurement separated by 5 min of rest. Results: Arterial occlusive pressure was significantly lower in the supine position compared to the seated position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and standing position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 241.50 ± 49.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). AOP was significantly higher in the standing position compared to the seated position (241.50 ± 49.3 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). Discussion: Arterial occlusive pressure measurement is body position dependent, thus for accurate prescription of occlusion pressure during surgery, BFR and IPC, AOP should be measured in the position intended for subsequent application of occlusion.
KW - Blood flow restriction exercise
KW - Ischemic preconditioning
KW - Kaatsu
KW - Limb occlusion pressure
KW - Occlusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046695913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7717/peerj.4697
DO - 10.7717/peerj.4697
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046695913
SN - 2167-8359
VL - 2018
JO - PeerJ
JF - PeerJ
IS - 5
M1 - e4697
ER -