Insights into the practice of expert simulation modellers

Rizwan Ahmed*, Mahmood H. Shah

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study we report the result of an empirical study investigating simulation modelling practices and processes of expert modellers in business and industry. The results suggest that most of the participants do not have a clearly defined or a formal process for developing their models, rather a set of key steps or stages depending on certain contextual factors and personal style. A number of contextual factors such as the problem domain, the scope of the problem, the size and complexity of the model, may affect the way a modeller goes about developing his/her simulation models. Generally a three phased approach is identifiable which can be named as problem definition, model development, and model usage. Model documentation largely depends on model life, client requirement, and type of model being developed. Maintenance and reuse of model is generally not practiced, given most of the models developed are of short to medium term use; however, experience and knowledge is something that is reused.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication23rd European modeling and simulation symposium
Subtitle of host publicationEMSS 2011
EditorsAgostino G. Bruzzone
Place of PublicationGenoa
PublisherDIPTEM
Pages289-298
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9788890372445
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event23rd European Modeling and Simulation Symposium, EMSS 2011 - Rome, Italy
Duration: 12 Sep 201114 Sep 2011

Publication series

Name23rd European Modeling and Simulation Symposium, EMSS 2011

Conference

Conference23rd European Modeling and Simulation Symposium, EMSS 2011
CountryItaly
CityRome
Period12/09/1114/09/11

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Insights into the practice of expert simulation modellers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this